
Welcome to the sDHT Adoption Library, featuring NaVi
NaVi is a closed-environment AI research assistant that leverages a carefully curated library of more than 300+ vetted documents, including FDA guidance and industry best practices. NaVi helps you search and explore content across the sDHT Adoption Library and Roadmap using natural language questions.
The Library is intended to serve as a living resource. Content is added periodically as new guidance, standards, and peer-reviewed research are released.
Meet NaVi: Your AI-Powered Research Assistant
Library scope and selection
To ensure high-quality, relevant results, the Library follows a predefined scoping approach:
- Inclusions: FDA guidance, non-commercial standards, and peer-reviewed research (2018–Present) focused on sDHTs being used as measurement tools for medical products in U.S.-based clinical trials.
- Exclusions: Materials from single commercial entities, non-U.S. regulatory bodies (except select EMA guidances with direct U.S. cross-relevance), and conference proceedings, and conference proceedings.
Inclusion in the Library does not imply endorsement, completeness, or regulatory acceptability.
Library scope
Resources in the sDHT Adoption Library are identified using a predefined scoping approach and include publicly available FDA guidance, non-commercial standards and guidance, and peer-reviewed research relevant to sDHT use in U.S.-based clinical trials. Materials from single commercial entities, non-U.S. regulatory bodies, conference proceedings, and studies conducted exclusively outside the United States are excluded; inclusion does not imply endorsement or regulatory acceptability.
Last updated 2026: Library content is reviewed and updated on a periodic basis as new eligible materials become available.
A Shared Perspective of Patient Technology Implementation in Clinical Trials
A Shared Perspective of Patient Technology Implementation in Clinical Trials
Patient technologies were used across 55 countries, with mobile applications (53%) and wearable devices (33%) being the most common technologies.
Common data issues included data transmission failures, duplicate or missing data, and integration challenges with other datasets.
Factors like technical literacy, device usability, and preferences for paper-based alternatives affected adoption rates, particularly in elderly populations.
Varying broadband connectivity, importation hurdles, and compliance with regulations like GDPR posed significant challenges.
Most sponsors (54%) were willing to reuse technologies, citing improved retention, compliance, and remote monitoring capabilities as key benefits.
Recommendations
Consider patient demographics, such as age and technical literacy, when selecting and implementing technologies.
Offer multi-format training for sites, patients, and monitors, and provide robust support systems to address technical and compliance issues.
Risk Mitigation: Anticipate potential issues like data loss, non-compliance, and technical failures by incorporating backup processes into protocols.
Conduct feasibility assessments for site infrastructure and regulatory compliance in target regions to minimize delays.
Regularly gather experiential feedback from patients to refine technologies and improve future trial designs.
Regulatory Considerations
Seek advice from regulators to ensure patient technologies align with clinical trial protocols and data submission requirements.
Ensure Compliance with GDPR and Local Regulations: Address privacy concerns and adapt technologies to meet country-specific requirements.
Prepare Documentation for Importation: Account for additional time and costs related to import licenses and customs requirements.
Plan for the impact of technical updates on clinical data reliability and regulatory submissions.
Some summaries are generated with the help of a large language model; always view the linked primary source of a resource you are interested in.
Patient Technology Implementation Framework
Patient Technology Implementation Framework
Successful PT implementation requires iterative planning across six stages to adapt to changing study goals and patient needs.
Early engagement with patients, caregivers, sites, and regulatory bodies is critical to align PT goals with stakeholder priorities.
Identifying technical, operational, and compliance risks early on is essential for smooth implementation and scalability.
Rapid, small-scale tests of technologies can help address unknowns, refine user experience, and mitigate technical risks before full-scale pilots.
Scaling PT across geographies and populations requires addressing regional variations in infrastructure, regulations, and cultural acceptance.
Recommendations
Start with a clear, organization-wide PT strategy to align with clinical trial goals and define success metrics.
Involve patients, sites, and regulatory authorities early to gather insights and ensure alignment with their needs and priorities.
Test technologies in controlled environments to validate functionality, usability, and integration before pilot studies.
Use technology pilots to collect data on feasibility, usability, and implementation challenges to inform broader rollouts.
Leverage learnings from pilots to develop a scalable strategy that addresses technical, regulatory, and cultural barriers.
Regulatory Considerations
Determine whether the technology is classified as a medical device and ensure compliance with relevant regulations (e.g., FDA, EMA, MDR).
Address data protection regulations, such as GDPR, by implementing robust privacy measures and secure data storage practices.
Account for region-specific regulatory requirements and infrastructure challenges during scaling.
Proactively consult regulatory agencies during pilots to align on technology use, endpoints, and data validity.
Some summaries are generated with the help of a large language model; always view the linked primary source of a resource you are interested in.